<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voter Turnout Archives - InsideOver</title>
	<atom:link href="https://it.insideover.com/tag/voter-turnout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.insideover.com/tag/voter-turnout</link>
	<description>Inside the news Over the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Boris Johnson Could Win and Lose the Election at the Same Time</title>
		<link>https://it.insideover.com/politics/boris-johnson-could-win-and-lose-the-election-at-the-same-time.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonella Zangaro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2019 UK General Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Turnout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insideover.com/?p=246008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="1920" height="1118" src="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154.jpg 1920w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-300x175.jpg 300w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-768x447.jpg 768w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-1024x596.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" /></p>
<p>In an interview with the Metro eight years ago, Boris Johnson described his morning routine “virtually erupt[ing] from bed like a rocketing pheasant. I then go for a run, because if you go for a run in the morning, nothing can get worse.” However, he doesn’t seem to have time for running anymore while his political &#8230; <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/boris-johnson-could-win-and-lose-the-election-at-the-same-time.html">[...]</a></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/boris-johnson-could-win-and-lose-the-election-at-the-same-time.html">Boris Johnson Could Win and Lose the Election at the Same Time</a> proviene da <a href="https://it.insideover.com">InsideOver</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1920" height="1118" src="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154.jpg 1920w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-300x175.jpg 300w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-768x447.jpg 768w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/LP_10735853-e1575542744154-1024x596.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" /></p><p class="p2"><span class="s1">In an interview with the <em>Metro</em> eight years ago, Boris Johnson described his morning routine “virtually erupt[ing] from bed like a rocketing pheasant. I then go for a run, because if you go for a run in the morning, nothing can get worse.” </span><span class="s1">However, he doesn’t seem to have time for running anymore while his political career is moving fast and high. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris Johnson is probably the most controversial figure in the history of British politics; liked by some, hated by many. </span><span class="s1">A majority fail to believe he tells the truth, yet people still vote for him and will probably do so on the 12th of December &#8211;  the date of the UK General Election &#8211; because he promotes himself as the only one able to reunite a divided country, despite being a very divisive political figure.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">His message is a simple one: “Get Brexit Done” which is exactly what the nation wants after three and a half years of endless discussion. </span><span class="s1">Johnson&#8217;s fictitiousness claims appear to play well with many who have been seduced to believe that being a member of the EU is a problem and that there is some sort of ‘Nirvana’ once the UK leaves. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">He has given a clear answer to the demands of the people, regardless of the accuracy of his pledge. “‘Get Brexit Done&#8217; is itself a lie because it lacks meaning; there is no apparent or revised deal, there is only a withdrawal agreement which leads to the conclusion of negotiations that the PM says will be ended by December 2020; which is impossible,” Gavin Esler, journalist and author of the book “<em>Brexit Without The<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>Bullshit: The Facts on Food, Jobs, Travel and the NHS</em>,” said. </span><span class="s1">The slogan is short, catchy and has received a good reception. People are too busy to pay too much attention to politics and lack the time to deeply analyse the manifestoes of each candidate, so an easy and direct claim is likely to attract the attention of the British public and garner votes.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris Johnson’s adversary,  Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, is somewhat distrusted, being considered an ardent socialist, but the Prime Minister is a simplifier of complicated matters and this makes his campaign powerful, although details may be omitted for the sake of simplified claims.</span></p>
<h2 class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris the unruly one</span></h2>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris Johnson, born Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, grew up wanting to be ‘King of the World’. Lacking attention to detail, he has followed no strict rules to build his success, instead, he has just followed his instinct. </span><span class="s1">He has unruly platinum blonde hair to look non-conventional and disruptive. </span><span class="s1">Supporters praise him as an entertaining, humorous and popular figure with an optimistic inclination and a spontaneous enthusiasm. </span><span class="s1">He is fascinated by Winston Churchill and people accuse him of modelling himself on the wartime prime minister ‘without possessing a scintilla of Churchill’s greatness,’ Andrew Gimson, the author ‘<em>T</em></span><em><span style="font-size: 1rem;">he Adventu</span></em><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><em>res Of Boris Johnson</em>’, remarked.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">He became Mayor of London defeating Ken Livingston twice and was running the non-Conservative and Labour-leaning city by surrounding himself with valuable lieutenants and directing them. </span><span class="s1">Whilst campaigning against Livingston, he avoided telling jokes in an attempt to show he could look more serious, but once in the office he never stopped tainting his political career with blunders, some worse than others and far from humorous.</span></p>
<p><span class="s1">Johnson has been accused of dishonesty, elitism, of using racist, sexist, islamophobic and homophobic language and has been the subject of several biographies; most of them harsh and ruthless. </span><span class="s1">Furthermore, in 2015, in Japan, he managed to flatten an opponent in what was supposed to be an informal game of rugby. The player he tackled was a 10-year-old Japanese schoolboy. “I’m so sorry,” Johnson told the child afterwards.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">“There is not a single thing he did as the Mayor of London that will be remembered,” Gavin Esler said recalling his mistakes.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">He removed many buses and replaced them with others which were more polluting; he firmly supported the proposal of the Garden Bridge, a new pedestrian</span><span style="font-size: 1rem;"> bridge over the River Thames which has never been built. He bought three water cannons for more than £322k that had never been used and were inevitably sold for scrap.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">“I talked to audiences all around the country and to those who admire Boris Johnson and I always ask: What has he achieved that you most admire? And they can’t answer,” Esler explains us.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">“He was such an incompetent Foreign Secretary. I talked to a lot of British diplomats and they said he is fundamentally lazy, he doesn’t read the briefs he doesn’t know what he is talking about. Thinking about what he has achieved, I can’t think about anything else except what he has achieved for himself,” Esler concludes.</span></p>
<h2 class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris the populist</span></h2>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris Johnson is an old Etonian classicist who has made efforts to let people believe he is ‘one of them’. </span><span class="s1">He has sold himself as an anti-élite and anti-establishment leader; with a simple and crystal clear message, he has become a successful populist and a cogent demagogue.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Jo Swinson, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, harshly attacked him saying that: “Boris Johnson only cares about Boris Johnson and he will do whatever it takes, sacrifice whoever is needed to get what he wants.” </span><span class="s1">One may think he wants to “Get Brexit done”, but Ms Swinson didn’t mean that. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">BoJo’s life has been about becoming Prime Minister, “not out of some burning desire to make people’s lives better, but out of some sense of Etonian entitlement because it’s what people like him get to do,” Swinson concluded.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">When he misled the Queen over his proroguing of Parliament, a few weeks ago, there was an <i>Ipsos Mori poll </i>asking people if they believed he had prorogued parliament for the reasons he said. </span><span class="s1">70% of British people answered stating that they didn’t believe him, but some of those people are likely to still vote for him. </span><span class="s1">The great paradox Great Britain is facing now is that, even if people, or some of them, really believe Johnson is not telling the truth because of his persuasive attitude, he may still become PM.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Even members of his family, fail to believe he is telling the truth either: Jo, his brother, quit his ministerial task and seat while Boris was in office saying he was “torn between family loyalty and the national interest,” while Rachel, his sister, is a broadcaster and pro-remain campaigner who is often interviewed about her brother’s lies and defaults. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">His strength is represented by being the opposite of a stereotype, the exception to the rule. He appears to connect with people even if he is considered to be unable to achieve what he claims. </span><span class="s1">Due to a disregard for truth that has come to characterize global politics, many voters start from a base assumption that politicians are dishonest. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Fake and true lay at the same low level, making big promises and getting away from them seems to provoke no outrage; nothing seems to be enough to convince an individual to say: ‘I will never vote this person anymore’. </span><span class="s1">Boris Johnson is currently benefiting from the scepticism he has created, while his opponents are likely to pay the price of it. </span></p>
<h2 class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris and the women</span></h2>
<p class="p4"><span class="s1">Boris has always been rather furtive with matters of his personal life. </span><span class="s1">Whilst being questioned during a recent radio interview, he refused to disclose how many children he had or whether he was involved in their lives. </span><span class="s1"><em>Wikipedia</em> reads “At least five.” </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s2">It is known that he has four children with his ex-wife Marina Wheeler and it is believed that he has one </span><span class="s1">or possibly more from other relationships, though Johnson has always refused to discuss this. </span><span class="s1">His current partner, Carrie Symonds, is the former Conservative Party&#8217;s Head of Communications. </span><span class="s1">She is supporting Johnson’s campaign while another women is publicly struggling from his alienation. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Jennifer Arcuri, a 34-year-old American entrepreneur, is the reason why journalists keep on asking Boris Johnson why he gave her £120,000 in public money while he was Mayor of London and why she was given privileged access to three foreign trade trips led by him. </span><span class="s1">The PM has refused to comment about any relationship with Arcuri stating that: “Everything was done entirely in the proper way” and denying any conflict of interest.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">At the end of October, the Government Internal Audit Agency concluded that a grant of public money to Arcuri’s High Tech Company, Hacker house, was ‘appropriate’. </span><span class="s1">During a radio phone-in show, on <i>LBC,</i> Johnson was questioned over past comments he had written about women during his time as a journalist. An article written in 1995 on the <em>Spectator</em> reads that: “Single mothers are producing a generation of ill-raised, ignorant, aggressive and illegitimate children” arguing that social housing available to single mothers was ‘an enticement’ for them to become pregnant.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">On an article published on the <i>Daily Telegraph</i> last year, he described women who wear burkas looking like ‘letter-boxes or bank robbers’. </span><span class="s1">He repeatedly said any claims in which he had expressed sexist and racist opinions in articles were a misrepresentation of his view. He further apologised if any offence was taken, but declined to rescind any of the stated views. </span><span class="s1">Boris Johnson was sacked by <i>The Times </i>for lying.</span></p>
<h2 class="p5"><span class="s1">Boris could win and lose the election at the same time</span></h2>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Sir Max Hastings, editor-in-chief of <i>The Daily Telegraph</i>, told the <i>Financial Times</i> that Mr Johnson<b> </b>was a ‘brilliant journalist&#8217;<b> </b>who was one of his “favourite colleagues.” </span><span class="s1">Asked by <i>TalkRadio</i> to give an opinion, he added: “He’s always been a fantasist. He’s never had much grip on reality,” concluding that “He’s less fit to be Prime Minister than my labrador”.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Despite Johnson&#8217;s ex-boss&#8217; point of view, one person appreciates his personality: Donald Trump. </span><span class="s1">There is an affinity between the two; t</span><span class="s1">hey were both born in New York, President Trump in an upper-class environment, Boris Johnson in a middle-class family, t</span><span class="s1">hey are both divisive figures: strongly admired and harshly hated, and t</span><span class="s1">hey are populist leaders sharing a tough relationship with mass media due to the accusations of being buffoons and, above all, liars.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1"><i>The Washington Post, </i>every three months, counts and publishes how many lies Mr Trump has told since he has been in office. </span><span class="s1">In the first half of October, after 993 days in the presidency, <i>The Fact Checker</i> stated he made more than 13,400 ‘false or misleading claims’. </span><span class="s1">Despite this statement, the latest <i>Economist </i>and <i>YouGov</i> poll, conducted right before Thanksgiving, showed that a majority of Republicans, 53%, think Donald Trump is a better president than the first Republican elected to that position, Abraham Lincoln. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Commenting on the results, the <i>CNN</i> website reads: “The poll demonstrates one of the historical givens of American politics: facts, evidence, expert opinion, rational analysis, and historical consensus fail to matter when it comes to political preference. Perhaps they also demonstrate a given of human nature: feelings, self-image, self-interest, life-long influences, birth and parentage, group affiliation and economic and social status are all-powerful forces that often determine what we think and how we vote.”</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Boris Johnson is also struggling with trust and honesty issues in his country. </span><span class="s1">Peter Oborne, a British well-known journalist, is part of the team that launched the website “<a href="http://boris-johnson-lies.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span class="s3">boris-johnson-lies.com</span></a>&#8221; which gathers “The lies, falsehoods and misrepresentations of BJ and his government.” </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">However, Boris Johnson has other anxieties to deal with.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">“What we don’t do traditionally as loving allies and friends, is get involved in each other’s election campaigns,” Mr Johnson said during a radio interview that he did not wish to receive any endorsement from Donald Trump (coming to London for the NATO summit). Johnson and his party fear that whatever comments made could damage their political campaign with one week to go until the end. </span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">But Johnson has also something else to concentrate on. </span><span class="s1">His last nightmare is that of winning the general election but losing his Uxbridge constituency. </span><span class="s1"><i>The Sunday Times</i> showed how tactical voting campaigns could damage the PM and six senior Tories. &#8220;The calculations were made by putting private poll findings and 270,000 voter interviews conducted by <i>YouGov</i> through a Datapraxis computer model, which analyses the specific demographics of each seat,” the newspaper explained.</span></p>
<p class="p2"><span class="s1">Johnson has a 16-point poll lead against Labour in his constituency of Uxbridge and South Ruislip. </span><span class="s1">Nonetheless, the analysis showed that if 13% of voters now intending to vote<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>Liberal Democrats or Green defect to Labour and turn-out is high, then Johnson could lose his seat even if he could win the election.</span></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/boris-johnson-could-win-and-lose-the-election-at-the-same-time.html">Boris Johnson Could Win and Lose the Election at the Same Time</a> proviene da <a href="https://it.insideover.com">InsideOver</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postponement, Pessimism and the Afghanistan Presidential Elections</title>
		<link>https://it.insideover.com/politics/postponement-pessimism-and-the-afghanistan-presidential-elections.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fayaz Mahessar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan Independent Election Commission (AIEC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Turnout]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.insideover.com/?p=242917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="1920" height="1118" src="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350.jpg 1920w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-300x175.jpg 300w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-768x447.jpg 768w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-1024x596.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" /></p>
<p>Security risks, historically low turnout, voter fraud, lapses in the biometric system and bickering amongst political candidates are some of the reasons why Afghans are beginning to feel alienated from the Presidential Elections held in September. Although more than two months have passed since the election date, the country’s Independent Election Commission (IEC) is yet &#8230; <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/postponement-pessimism-and-the-afghanistan-presidential-elections.html">[...]</a></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/postponement-pessimism-and-the-afghanistan-presidential-elections.html">Postponement, Pessimism and the Afghanistan Presidential Elections</a> proviene da <a href="https://it.insideover.com">InsideOver</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1920" height="1118" src="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350.jpg 1920w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-300x175.jpg 300w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-768x447.jpg 768w, https://media.insideover.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LP_5542453-e1574156629350-1024x596.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" /></p><p>Security risks, historically low turnout, voter fraud, lapses in the biometric system and bickering amongst political candidates are some of the reasons why Afghans are beginning to feel alienated from the Presidential Elections held in September.</p>
<p>Although more than two months have passed since the election date, the country’s Independent Election Commission (IEC) is yet to count the votes.</p>
<p>The results were initially due on October 19 but the date was extended after the IEC’s ill-trained staff were faced with technical difficulties due to the use of biometric data systems –first time in the country’s electoral history.</p>
<p>However, the IEC officials failed to meet that deadline. On November 2, the commission said votes from all 34 provinces will be tallied again. The results of which, it said, will be announced on November 14.</p>
<p>But another deadline came and went; election officials postponed the results yet again. However, this time around, they did not even give a new date.</p>
<p>Apart from the low turnout and biometric failure on Election Day, the delays in the announcement of the results have raised suspicions over the veracity of the counting process.</p>
<h2>What is causing the delay?</h2>
<p>The bone of contentions lies with the dispute amongst the top-two candidates &#8211; Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah &#8211; who have both alleged voter fraud in the counting process.</p>
<p>On the Election Day, the IEC reported that around 26,500 polling stations were open, from which it received ballot papers from around 25,500 stations. However, of the papers received from these stations, the IEC had biometric verification on ballots from only 24,800 stations.</p>
<p>But campaigners have said that of the estimated 24,800 stations, they will only accept votes from around 18,850 stations. The rest of the votes, they say are inadmissible.</p>
<p>However, following the initial delay in the announcement of results and verifying the votes, the IEC managed to add data from around 8,400 more stations to the tally. Subsequently, to recount the votes, it had to extend the announcement date to November 14.</p>
<p>However, this time around, the revisions in the total number of stations were not accepted by the election campaigners.</p>
<p>After the IEC announced the revised ballot numbers, Abdullah, the incumbent chief executive, boycotted the recount.</p>
<p><a href="https://tolonews.com/index.php/node/159239" target="_blank" rel="noopener">He said that</a> “we have decided not to participate in the vote recounting process. The IEC’s impartiality will be questioned if it does not review its decision and our next decision will be made after that.”</p>
<p>He complained that “votes from 2,400 ballot boxes have been entered into the servers that don’t have data.”</p>
<p>“There are more than 100,000 votes that came outside the valid time (Before and after the voting process started),” he alleged.</p>
<p>Moreover, he asked the IEC to review its decision on adding the new votes while earning that any “illegal decision” on the election will result in a crisis.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in a recent article published online, Ashraf Ghani’s advisers said that “their margin is so comfortable that even if half a million votes are thrown out, they would still win. Mr Abdullah’s advisers, on the other hand, say if all fraudulent votes are removed their candidate will win in the first round and if some level of questionable votes gets counted, the most likely scenario is a runoff.”</p>
<p>But as the IEC continues to extend the deadlines and candidates allege fraud, it is the Afghans who continue to look at the turn of events with increased pessimism.</p>
<p>For them, the only glimmer of hope has been its democracy but trust in that too is beginning to falter.</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://it.insideover.com/politics/postponement-pessimism-and-the-afghanistan-presidential-elections.html">Postponement, Pessimism and the Afghanistan Presidential Elections</a> proviene da <a href="https://it.insideover.com">InsideOver</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 59/87 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: it.insideover.com @ 2026-08-27 17:14:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->